Timing patterns
Synchronized posting, burst windows and repeated timing.
Commonsent Signal helps brands and communications agencies examine patterns of potentially coordinated public activity, inspect supporting and countervailing evidence, and make more informed response decisions.
Experimental software, separately hosted. Judgment-set thresholds and synthetic demonstrations are not independent real-world validation. False-positive rates and calibration remain unverified.
Individual signals are not proof of malicious conduct. Coverage, sampling and counter-evidence matter as much as a score.
Synchronized posting, burst windows and repeated timing.
Account clusters, shared amplification and connectivity.
Account age and available provenance; missing metadata limits inference.
Repeated URLs, domains and cross-platform wording.
Concentrated amplification relative to the wider captured conversation.
Repeated templates and language similarity; markers do not prove automation.
Cascade shape, reactivation and changes in activity over time.
Public-conversation captures, topic and source filters, date windows, relevance filtering and deduplication. Compatible listening exports include Meltwater, Brandwatch and Talkwalker field mappings; these are file imports, not live API integrations. Other CSV formats require mapping and validation.
Network visualization, volume and burst timelines, executive overview, deeper analytical evidence and counter-evidence support human interpretation. Sensitivity, source provenance and missing coverage belong in the review.
The pilot includes executive reporting, department-oriented response options, evidence integrity records, a run ledger and later outcome feedback. Integrity fingerprints help compare records; they do not establish legal admissibility or absolute tamper resistance.
Vendor-specific imports require compatibility checks with your actual export. Real-world accuracy and calibration remain subject to further validation.
Crisis communications · brand reputation · suspected coordinated reviews · narrative monitoring · campaign integrity · public conversation assessment.
Discuss a scoped, manually reviewed assessment, evidence brief and response considerations.
Explore recurring analytical support and agreed review requirements. Scope is established through inquiry.
In Development: recurring narrative, coordination and policy monitoring. No availability or service-level commitment.
Coordination can be authentic. Apparent AI-generated text does not establish automation. Small or biased samples limit inference; numerical outputs remain experimental estimates. Public attribution requires additional evidence and appropriate review. Signal is not intended for undisclosed manipulation or retaliatory amplification.
Human review, coverage limitations, methodology documentation and outcome feedback are essential to calibration. Explore Social Listening & Narrative Intelligence services →